We Can Only See Natural White Light

The Limits of Our Senses 🤏

​Humans have evolved to perceive a very narrow slice of reality—just enough to help us survive and thrive on Earth. Here are a few categories of things that are “actually there” but remain invisible to us and like i said… how woukd one know that a God is not there… thats why we call it faith:

• ​The Electromagnetic Spectrum (Light): Our eyes are only sensitive to a tiny range of wavelengths called visible light.

• ​Beyond Red: We can’t see infrared (heat) or radio waves, which are constantly passing through and around us, carrying information for TV, radio, and Wi-Fi.

• ​Beyond Violet: We can’t see ultraviolet (UV), X-rays, or gamma rays, which are forms of light that can pass right through our bodies (and are the reason you need sunscreen or a lead apron at the doctor).

• ​Fundamental Particles: The world is built from particles too small to see or feel.

• ​Atoms: You can’t see the individual atoms that make up your hand, but they are undeniably there.

• ​Neutrinos: As mentioned before, trillions of these tiny, near-massless particles, produced by the Sun and other cosmic events, pass through your body every second without interaction. They are truly “ghostly” matter.

​The Invisible Universe 🌌
​Your thought is particularly relevant to cosmology, which relies entirely on indirect evidence to study the majority of the universe’s mass-energy content:

• ​Dark Matter: Accounts for about 27% of the universe’s total mass-energy. It’s only detected through its gravitational pull. We believe it’s streaming through your body right now, but because it doesn’t interact with the electromagnetic force, it remains unseen and unfelt.

• ​Dark Energy: Accounts for about 68% of the universe’s total mass-energy. This mysterious force is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. It’s thought to be inherent to space itself, existing everywhere but completely undetectable by human senses.

​In essence, our senses evolved for a 5% universe (the ordinary matter we’re made of), but 95% of the universe is fundamentally invisible and undetectable to us without the aid of sophisticated technology and or a hypothesized theory stating something that could be real or could not be real even if not viewed from reality like soace itsekf or read below:

1. The Power of the Analogy (Theological Perspective)

​For many people of faith, the very existence of things we cannot see (like dark matter, neutrinos, or even invisible radio waves) supports the idea of a transcendent God. The reasoning goes:

• ​If the physical universe we inhabit is 95% invisible (Dark Matter/Energy), then it is completely logical that the ultimate source of reality (God) might also be undetectable by our limited senses.

• ​This perspective suggests God is not merely “an invisible object” but exists in a different mode of reality that our physical eyes or scientific instruments cannot access. A divine being is considered to be transcendent—existing outside of or beyond the material world and its normal rules.

​2. The Limits of Scientific Empiricism

​From a purely scientific standpoint:
• ​Science is confined to investigating things that have a measurable, predictable, or repeatable effect on the physical world.

• ​We infer dark matter’s existence because it exerts a measurable gravitational force.

• ​We cannot apply scientific methods to prove or disprove the existence of a God because God, in most definitions, does not produce a measurable effect that can be isolated, controlled, and tested in a laboratory setting.

• ​Therefore, science has to be silent on the question of God’s existence—it is outside its domain.

In Conclusion

​It is absolutely possible that a divine being exists in a layer of reality that is unseen and beyond our senses, much like dark matter. This possibility is a matter of faith and philosophical exploration, which seeks answers where empirical science currently cannot venture. The “unseen” nature of most of the cosmos that has been pointed out here is a compelling philosophical backdrop for this kind of thinking.

Source energy is neither male nor female but its getting drawn as a feminine ebergy because I am getting tired of seeing yhe masculine side of sometging tgat shoykd not be anthropomorphisisng something as though its human.